I watched Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, on Charlie Rose the other night. I figure he was dealt such a bad hand from previous management that there has not been any opportunity to make London Whale size bets in stupid non economic transactions. He appears to understand his advantage of scale so as not to get distracted by traders playing with themselves. Curiously from my reading of Fools Gold I thought that J P Morgan Chase had the brainpower and discipline to play with complex financial instruments, but it appears the Morgan group was over powered by the Chase side and the dummies were left in charge.
The best overall regulation the U. S. could impose is to limit the size of every financial institution so that the possibility of out right failure guides every actor.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Once More Through the revolving Door for Justice's Breuer
In today's New York Times I see that Lanny Breuer will rejoin his old law firm as vice chairman at $4 million a year, which from my perspective is a reward for his lack of prosecutorial vigor toward his former clients. See the PBS Frontline show "The Untouchables" for an example of how pathetic Lanny was as a public servant.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Masked by Gibberish, The Risk Run Amok
Floyd Norris's piece in the business section of the New York Times commented "on the sheer incompetence and stupidity documented in the report" by Senator Levin's subcommittee. J P Morgan Chase pays lobbyist to get their way and then believes the fantasy they propose. What a loser feed back loop.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Nothing Much Has Changed
Jesse
Eisinger's article today in the New York Times DealBook section asks
“what
would happen if this report does what the senator hopes and puts
pressure on the regulators to finish a simplified and loophole-free
Volcker
Rule,
which would prohibit banks from making bets for their own profit
using taxpayer-backed money. Why should we have the slightest
confidence that big banks could be persuaded to follow it? And why
should we feel reassured that, if they didn’t, regulators could or
would enforce it?
We
shouldn’t. And we don’t.” Exactly what I say. No regulation replaces fear of bankruptcy among all the actors, debtors and creditors, so that risky transactions are not a game, but a life or death existential reality. TBTF banks will always look at Dodd Frank as something to be gamed.
From my Libertarian perspective I find Dodd Frank irrelevant. TBTF banks are utilities to me. Certainly nothing to invest in or to leave savings with. The fortress balance sheet mentality espoused by J P Morgan Chase appears to have been a PR thing around the time of the Bear Stearns rescue. As I understand it, it was Hank Paulson who had to insist on the low ball offer of two dollars a share since it appears Jamie Dimon actually thought there was enough positive value to offer ten dollars !
Nothing Much Has Changed
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Boeing's Vietnam
Financial
engineering is an apt description of derivatives and other financial
instruments that require a thorough understanding to minimize risk.
Boeing, in the realm of physical engineering, is betting heavily on
Lithium Ion battery technology that it appears not to thoroughly
understand. It is at risk of making incorrect decisions to salvage
sunken costs. From a cursory amateur point of view it is understood
that a battery that can take such a quick charge and deliver high
energy is a very volatile cocktail. Reassurances that software and
containment can manage the problem are not. Today's headline in the
New York Times business section “Setback to Boeing's Hopes for
Longer Range for 787” indicates a lack of understanding of the
risks from which they appear to have been blind to since the
inception of the Dreamliner project.
A
change to a nickle based battery system that is less volatile will
require a lengthy period to redesign and certify which will costs
billions because the intricate production line will have to stop. It is a gutsy decision that has to be made. The alternative stay the course non decision jeopardizes the plane's 180 minute safe flying distance from an emergency landing airport, much less the 300 minute range it was designed for. The FAA is a creature of industry so Boeing could push to get the Dreamliner flying again, but the agency will dither on the 180 minutes over unassisted flight zones until millions of hours of restricted use are completed. The plane is unsalable under such a ruling because the competing Airbus 350x is just a few short years away and is learning from Boeing's mistakes by designing out the Lithium Ion Battery.
My
favorite movie about the financial crisis is “Margin Call.” The
Jeremy Irons character was brilliant when asking the rocket scientist
to speak to him as if he were a child. From that elementary
description of the problem the boss understood that a big gutsy
decision had to be made to save the company from certain disaster.
Boeing's CEO has to do the same and quickly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)